Yes, it encourages folks to use it when we know it is buggy and we have no plans to maintain/improve it. I don't think that follows but then I also think that the reasons for not continuing work here also apply to this alternative. I personally doubt this is easing dev life significantly, but even if it does, I would humbly suggest to drop it until something can be offered in return, because the perception of removing it costs more. There's quite a difference between we have this SSB alpha thing, it's lame but you can use it for now and the categorical we have nothing. The work that will be removed here likely wouldn't help much with the implementation of that.īut removing the work here now, makes any implementation of that alternative later highly unlikely. This sounds like a different feature really and should probably be filed as such. url to signal request to open in such mode automatically Maybe even add some # to the link in saved. Something along the lines of adding support for opening a link in fullscreen mode, with the twist offered by full-screen-api.ignore-widgets How about sending the right signal and put in couple hours work and couple days in testing adopting the fullscreen api for this purpose,Īs to not costing us time in terms of bug triage and keeping it around? (In reply to Dave Townsend from comment #2)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |